Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2004
52.6% pass rate
from 1,012 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (78% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps (44% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.99% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Individual lamps (74% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.099% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.49% fail on Battery
    • 0.20% fail on Horn
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.099% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Spring mounting (31 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (43% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Front (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Location
    • 0.89% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.49% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Front suspension joints (65% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Panhard rods (33 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment (238 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts (95% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Front drive shafts (95% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.099% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.099% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.099% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes (20% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (84% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Components (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Hoses
        • 0.099% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.099% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.20% fail on Leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (55% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.099% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.099% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.099% fail on Condition
        • 0.099% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.099% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.099% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.099% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (60% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (83% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Emissions
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Tank
      • 0.20% fail on Pipe
      • 0.20% fail on System
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Requirements
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 6.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Vehicle structure (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Chassis (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Drivers
    • 0.20% fail on Body security
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.099% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.099% fail on Tailgate
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Valve stem
  • 0.79% fail on Towbars (27 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Vehicle structure (42 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Towbar
  • 0.79% fail on Steering (84% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Steering system (84% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Free play
        • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.099% fail on Power steering
      • 0.099% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages