MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Pinin » 2002

Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.1% pass rate
from 305 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Springs
      • 0.98% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.98% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.33% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.66% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.66% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.33% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.33% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.66% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.33% fail on Rbt
          • 0.33% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.98% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.98% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.33% fail on Lever
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.66% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.66% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.66% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.66% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.33% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.9% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Doors
      • 0.66% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.66% fail on Door condition
      • 0.33% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Hinge
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.66% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Engine mounting (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Bracket (30 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.33% fail on Towbar
      • 0.33% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.33% fail on Transmission
      • 0.33% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.33% fail on Joints
    • 0.33% fail on Cabs
      • 0.33% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 7.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.33% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.98% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.33% fail on Vehicle Identification Number

Search Good Garages