MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Shogun Pinin » 2002

Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.3% pass rate
from 529 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.76% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.76% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.57% fail on Suspension rods (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Suspension rod (24 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.38% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.19% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps (85% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Position lamp (89% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.57% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.95% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Horn
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.19% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 9.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.95% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.76% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.19% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.19% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.19% fail on Other braking system component
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Chassis (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Chassis condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Towbar (23 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure (25 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.95% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.57% fail on Body
      • 0.38% fail on Panel
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
        • 0.19% fail on Hinge
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Transmission
      • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Joints
    • 0.19% fail on Floor
    • 0.19% fail on Cabs
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 3.2% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.19% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.19% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.95% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
    • 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Steering linkage components (72% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages