Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.4% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.40% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.80% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.40% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.80% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal
      • 0.80% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.80% fail on Lever
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.40% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Chassis condition (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Towbar (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank
      • 0.40% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.80% fail on Body
      • 0.40% fail on Panel
      • 0.40% fail on Other body component
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.40% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 7.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 7.2% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment (35 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.80% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.80% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.80% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on View to rear
      • 0.40% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages