Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results
Registered in 200053.1% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
- 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
-
1.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.5% fail on Coil spring
- 0.77% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint
- 0.77% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.77% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.77% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt
-
2.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.77% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
6.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
-
4.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.77% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.77% fail on Pedal
-
0.77% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.77% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 11% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Chassis
- 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
- 9.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.77% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.77% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.6% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.77% fail on Washers
-
0.77% fail on
Steering
-
0.77% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.77% fail on Track rod end
-
0.77% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.77% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.77% fail on Attachment
-
0.77% fail on
Tyres
- 0.77% fail on Tread depth