Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.1% pass rate
from 130 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Shogun Pinin is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.77% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.77% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.77% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
    • 5.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.77% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.77% fail on Pedal
    • 0.77% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.77% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.77% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.77% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.77% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.77% fail on Washers
  • 0.77% fail on Steering
    • 0.77% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.77% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.77% fail on Attachment
  • 0.77% fail on Tyres
    • 0.77% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages