MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Pajero » 2000

Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 2000
55.4% pass rate
from 83 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.2% fail on Components
        • 7.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 1.2% fail on Operation
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on ABS
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Body condition
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.4% fail on Steering
    • 8.4% fail on Steering system
      • 6.0% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
        • 1.2% fail on Steering pivot point
  • 4.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages