Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.0% pass rate
from 85 tests in 2020
(4.8% better than other 1999 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (25% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.4% fail on Springs (16% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Coil springs (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Coil spring (28% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 16% fail on Brakes (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance (7.0% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (7.7% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (96% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Master cylinder
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (11% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (9.8% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (3.0% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (17% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.4% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Other components
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility (23% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Wipers (21% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (21% better than other 1999 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Undertray
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (13% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (20% worse than other 1999 cars)

Search Good Garages