Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results
Registered in 199863.0% pass rate
from 54 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
- 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
-
5.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.9% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 1.9% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.9% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
7.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
5.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.7% fail on
Chassis
- 3.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.9% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
1.9% fail on
Springs
- 1.9% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (14 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.7% fail on Intermediate drop arm (119 times worse than other 1998 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering linkage components