Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1995
60.4% pass rate
from 1,026 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (87% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (46% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (56% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps (46% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear lamps (61% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (54% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.097% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
        • 0.097% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Individual lamps (78% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.097% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Horn
    • 0.29% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.097% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.097% fail on Lamp
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Attachment
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.29% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.19% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (60% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.29% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
    • 0.97% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.19% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (80% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.097% fail on General condition
    • 0.097% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.097% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (51% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Components (54% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Pipes (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Hoses (76% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.39% fail on Valves
      • 0.68% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Leaks
      • 0.097% fail on Operation
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels (50% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.097% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (98% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.097% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.49% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.39% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.29% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (38% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Emissions (55% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on System (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Cap
      • 0.29% fail on Hose
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Body condition (60% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Vehicle structure (67% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis (67% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Drivers
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
    • 0.097% fail on Speedometer
  • 7.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.097% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.097% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Steering pivot point (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.29% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.19% fail on Free play
        • 0.19% fail on Steering box
      • 0.097% fail on Steering box
    • 0.29% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Steering control
      • 0.19% fail on Steering column
    • 0.097% fail on Power steering
      • 0.097% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 4.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.29% fail on Requirements
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (53% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 0.88% fail on Towbars
    • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.19% fail on Towbar
  • 0.88% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages