Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1995
60.9% pass rate
from 781 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission (87% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Drive shafts (95% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Joints (97% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.38% fail on Joints
        • 0.13% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Belts
    • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Chassis (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis condition (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Fuel system (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Hose (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on System (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.64% fail on Cabs (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Towbar
      • 0.51% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.51% fail on Body
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition
      • 0.13% fail on Panel
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (99% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.77% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.26% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.90% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.38% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (52% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.90% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.64% fail on Rbt
          • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.51% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.51% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.38% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.38% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.64% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.26% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.38% fail on Steering play
      • 0.38% fail on Steering box
    • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.26% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.26% fail on Steering column
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering box
  • 5.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (43% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.13% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      • 0.77% fail on Spark ignition (89% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Catalyst emissions (86% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.77% fail on Condition
  • 0.90% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
  • 0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages