MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Pajero » 1994

Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1994
58.6% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Chassis
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Hose
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.7% fail on Cabs
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage (16 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.2% fail on Shock absorbers (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.9% fail on Washers
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 6.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.7% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 3.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 3.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages