Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results
Registered in 199257.3% pass rate
from 562 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
9.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Fog lamp (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tell tale (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Switch
- 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.1% fail on Front lamps
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.36% fail on All position lamps
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.0% fail on Battery
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Horn
-
0.89% fail on
Headlamps
(70% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Headlamp (75% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.36% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.71% fail on
Direction indicators
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(77% better than other 1992 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.36% fail on Switch
- 0.18% fail on Lamp
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
9.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(110% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
21% fail on
Suspension
(38% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Linkage condition (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Attachment
-
6.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.18% fail on Universal joint
-
6.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(150% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 3.7% fail on Component mounting
- 1.6% fail on Spring mounting (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
(170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.89% fail on Front
-
0.71% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.71% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
8.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(61% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Components
(72% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Pipes (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Hoses
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.18% fail on Valves
- 0.53% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.53% fail on Leaks
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
7.7% fail on
Components
(72% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.0% fail on Front wheels
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Hub components
(120% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Brake discs
-
0.53% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.53% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.36% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Condition
-
0.36% fail on
Pedal
-
0.36% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.18% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.18% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.18% fail on ABS
-
8.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(61% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.8% fail on Exhaust system (53% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.89% fail on Pipe
- 0.89% fail on System
- 0.36% fail on Hose
- 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested
-
10.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(91% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Body condition (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.3% fail on Chassis
-
0.53% fail on
Doors
- 0.53% fail on Passengers other
-
0.53% fail on
Seats
- 0.53% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Speedometer
- 0.18% fail on Body security
-
8.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 0.18% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
-
6.4% fail on
Steering system
- 4.4% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Steering box
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint
-
0.36% fail on
Free play
- 0.36% fail on Steering box
- 0.18% fail on Steering arm
-
0.18% fail on
Other components
- 0.18% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.18% fail on
Steering control
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.18% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Other components
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.4% fail on
Steering system
-
5.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Requirements
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
(54% better than other 1992 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
-
0.71% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.71% fail on Registration plate
-
0.53% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.53% fail on Attachment
-
0.36% fail on
Towbars
- 0.18% fail on Towbar
- 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure