Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1992
59.8% pass rate
from 353 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.0% fail on Horn
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.57% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.28% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.57% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.57% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (84% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.57% fail on Joints
        • 0.28% fail on Prop shaft
    • 5.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Pipe
      • 0.57% fail on System
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.57% fail on Mounting fixings (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Panel
      • 0.28% fail on Other body component
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 0.57% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.57% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.57% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
      • 0.28% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
    • 0.57% fail on Floor
    • 0.57% fail on Cabs (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Springs
      • 0.28% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.28% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.57% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.28% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt
          • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.57% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.57% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.57% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.28% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.28% fail on Servos
    • 0.28% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.28% fail on View to rear
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.1% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Intermediate drop arm (10 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.28% fail on Components
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Other components
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
    • 0.85% fail on Steering column (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Steering play
      • 0.57% fail on Steering box (6 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Steering box
    • 0.28% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.28% fail on Universal joint
  • 6.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks (190% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Other leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.28% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.28% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages