Mitsubishi Pajero MOT Results

Registered in 1991
60.7% pass rate
from 239 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1991 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Pajero is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 10% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 10% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Tell tale
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.42% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.84% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.42% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 0.84% fail on Trailer electrical socket (28 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.42% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.42% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage condition (10 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.84% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.84% fail on Front
    • 0.42% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.42% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (77% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Components (110% worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Pipes (180% worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Hoses
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.84% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.84% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.42% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components (170% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.42% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.42% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.42% fail on Pedal
        • 0.42% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.42% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.42% fail on Components
        • 0.42% fail on Pump/compressors
    • 0.42% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on System (4 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (91% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Body condition (120% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis
    • 0.84% fail on Seats
      • 0.84% fail on Drivers
  • 8.8% fail on Steering
    • 7.9% fail on Steering system
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.1% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Locking devices (9 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Drive system
  • 6.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.42% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.42% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 5.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Towbars
    • 0.42% fail on Towbar
  • 0.42% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages