MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Outlander » 2016

Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.1% pass rate
from 11,442 tests in 2021
(12% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.9% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Washers (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.061% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.017% fail on View to rear
      • 0.017% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0087% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.6% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs and drums (41% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Brake discs (41% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Cable
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.017% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0087% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.39% fail on Rbt
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.087% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.061% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.061% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.035% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.026% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Pedal
    • 0.044% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.026% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.035% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.026% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0087% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.0087% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0087% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.017% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (21% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (39% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (76% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.00% fail on Headlamp aim (30% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (88% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (64% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (64% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0087% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.061% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.035% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.044% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.026% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.026% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 1.1% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (34 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage
      • 0.017% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension arms (54% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0087% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Axle (92 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.061% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint (27 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0087% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0087% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.035% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.026% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.017% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0087% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 0.41% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust emissions (53% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (58% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0087% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.017% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.017% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.017% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.0087% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0087% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.29% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.061% fail on Transmission (72% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.017% fail on Flexible couplings (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Belts
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.035% fail on Body
      • 0.026% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0087% fail on Panel
    • 0.0087% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0087% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0087% fail on Doors
      • 0.0087% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0087% fail on Door condition
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.24% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.017% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0087% fail on Attachment
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.20% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (48% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.0087% fail on Other components
        • 0.0087% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.0087% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.0087% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0087% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0087% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages