Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results
Registered in 201283.9% pass rate
from 1,201 tests in 2017
(24% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.
-
5.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.6% fail on Wipers (57% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Washers
- 0.33% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(51% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.75% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.75% fail on Front lamps
-
0.58% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.58% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.50% fail on Registration plate lamp (73% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.33% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Headlamps
(76% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.083% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.083% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.083% fail on Headlamp
-
0.17% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.25% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket (22 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brakes
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.33% fail on Brake discs
- 0.083% fail on Brake linings
-
0.75% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.42% fail on Front wheels
- 0.25% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.083% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.083% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.083% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.083% fail on Brake operation
- 0.083% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.50% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.33% fail on
Components
- 0.17% fail on Pipes
- 0.083% fail on Hoses
- 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.33% fail on
Components
-
0.083% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.083% fail on
Pedal
- 0.083% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.083% fail on
Pedal
-
2.4% fail on
Hub components
-
2.7% fail on
Tyres
(51% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.75% fail on Condition (74% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
- 0.083% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.083% fail on Valve stem
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension
(61% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.67% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.33% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.33% fail on Condition
-
0.083% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.083% fail on Condition
-
0.083% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.083% fail on Attachment
-
0.083% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.083% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.083% fail on Front
- 0.083% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.75% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
0.50% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.50% fail on Registration plate
-
0.42% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.083% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.083% fail on System
-
0.25% fail on
Steering
-
0.25% fail on
Steering system
- 0.25% fail on Track rod end
-
0.25% fail on
Steering system
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
0.17% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review