Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results
Registered in 201167.4% pass rate
from 1,619 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.
-
9.6% fail on
Steering
(4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Power steering
- 0.062% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.062% fail on Pump
- 0.062% fail on Other components
-
9.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Brakes
(30% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(58% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(77% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.19% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
- 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(58% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(70% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs (71% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(70% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Hand lever
-
0.062% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.062% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.062% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.062% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Individual direction indicators (88% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.062% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
(51% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.12% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.12% fail on Horn
-
0.062% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.062% fail on Position lamp
-
0.062% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.062% fail on Switch
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2011 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(70% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.062% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.062% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
-
0.062% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.062% fail on Windscreen
-
0.062% fail on
View to rear
- 0.062% fail on Mirrors
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
(32% better than other 2011 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(56% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.12% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.062% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.062% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.86% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(60% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (65% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Transmission
(81% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.12% fail on Tank
- 0.062% fail on Pipe
-
0.12% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Body
- 0.12% fail on Other body component
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.062% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.062% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.12% fail on Undertray
-
0.062% fail on
Doors
-
0.062% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.062% fail on Door condition
-
0.062% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.56% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.56% fail on Attachment
-
0.49% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.062% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.37% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.37% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Outlander (2007 - 2012)
Handsome looks and plenty of kit, Mitsubishi chain cam 2.3 DI-D engine is excellent. 5 seats + 2 child seats. Very competent off-road with 4WD. Also available with 2WD.