MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Outlander » 2010

Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results

Registered in 2010
63.5% pass rate
from 1,832 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.055% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.055% fail on Steering play
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
  • 11% fail on Brakes (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (47% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.49% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 10% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.38% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.22% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Coil springs (96% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.055% fail on Axles
      • 0.055% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.055% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.055% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.055% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.055% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.055% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Horn
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.055% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.22% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.055% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.055% fail on Position lamp
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.055% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.055% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.49% fail on Spark ignition (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.38% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.055% fail on Joints
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Carrier
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
    • 0.055% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.055% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.055% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.055% fail on Undertray
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.055% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Outlander (2007 - 2012)
    Handsome looks and plenty of kit, Mitsubishi chain cam 2.3 DI-D engine is excellent. 5 seats + 2 child seats. Very competent off-road with 4WD. Also available with 2WD.

    Search Good Garages