Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results

Registered in 2009
70.3% pass rate
from 1,598 tests in 2017
(10% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.81% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.38% fail on Battery
    • 0.31% fail on Headlamps (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.063% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.063% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.063% fail on Horn
  • 9.8% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Hub components (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.063% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.50% fail on Electronic stability system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on ABS
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.88% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.88% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.19% fail on Front
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Front drive shafts (88% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.063% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.063% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Component mounting
  • 5.4% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
  • 4.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type
  • 0.81% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (59% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Tank (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Cap
      • 0.063% fail on System
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.063% fail on Emissions
  • 0.56% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.50% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.44% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
    • 0.063% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.063% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.38% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.19% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Condition
  • 0.063% fail on Towbars
    • 0.063% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

  • Mitsubishi Outlander (2007 - 2012)
    Handsome looks and plenty of kit, Mitsubishi chain cam 2.3 DI-D engine is excellent. 5 seats + 2 child seats. Very competent off-road with 4WD. Also available with 2WD.

    Search Good Garages