Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results
Registered in 200554.3% pass rate
from 276 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(97% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Linkage (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
8.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.72% fail on Suspension arm
-
2.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.72% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint
-
0.36% fail on
Axles
- 0.36% fail on Axle
-
0.36% fail on
Springs
-
0.36% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.36% fail on Mounting
-
0.36% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.36% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(97% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.4% fail on Rear reflectors (19 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.72% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.36% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.36% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.36% fail on
Flashing type
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.72% fail on
Decelerometer
(22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (23 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.36% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.36% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs
-
3.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.4% fail on Lever
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.72% fail on Pedal
- 0.36% fail on Hand lever
-
0.36% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(71% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.36% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
8.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(71% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.36% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.36% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
9.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.2% fail on
Steering
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.36% fail on
Steering play
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
-
6.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.72% fail on
Sub-frame
(30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Sub-frame condition (31 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.72% fail on
Sub-frame
(30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Chassis
- 0.36% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on Pipe
-
0.36% fail on
Transmission
-
0.36% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.36% fail on Joints
-
0.36% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.36% fail on
Load security
-
0.36% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.36% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.36% fail on
Tailgate
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Washers
-
0.36% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.36% fail on Windscreen
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.72% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.72% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.72% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.72% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.72% fail on Attachment
-
0.36% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.36% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Outlander (2004 - 2006)
Well equipped, solidly built and roomy, with a good view out.