Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results
Registered in 200453.1% pass rate
from 367 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.0% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
- 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.54% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (20 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Sub-frame (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.82% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.27% fail on
Springs
-
0.27% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.27% fail on Coil spring
-
0.27% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.27% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.27% fail on Suspension rod
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.82% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.82% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.82% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.54% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.54% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Rear reflectors (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.27% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
-
0.27% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.27% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.27% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
6.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Brake linings (27 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs
-
4.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (69% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.54% fail on Lever
-
0.54% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.54% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.27% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.27% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
8.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Steering
(190% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 13% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack
-
0.27% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
13% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(95% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.27% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.27% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.27% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.27% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(95% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.4% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
(68% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Drive shafts
(83% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.27% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.27% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.54% fail on
Drive shafts
(83% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Chassis
- 0.54% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.54% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.27% fail on Tank
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
-
0.27% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.27% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.27% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.27% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.27% fail on
Body
- 0.27% fail on Other body component
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Hinge
-
0.27% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
5.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
-
1.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.82% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Outlander (2004 - 2006)
Well equipped, solidly built and roomy, with a good view out.