Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results
Registered in 200447.3% pass rate
from 730 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (56% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (43% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Front lamps
- 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.1% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Rear reflectors (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(29% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Linkage condition (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(92% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (97% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
2.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.82% fail on Component mounting
- 0.41% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.96% fail on
Drive shafts
(75% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Constant velocity joints (74% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Front drive shafts
(74% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.41% fail on
Radius arms
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Wheel bearings
(75% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rear
-
0.27% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
(12 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Attachment
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
14% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(140% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.8% fail on Parking brake performance (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.55% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Front wheels (79% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Brake operation (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake imbalance
-
7.1% fail on
Hub components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.41% fail on Brake calipers
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 0.27% fail on Hoses
- 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.41% fail on Leaks
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Restricted movement
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 10% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
- 0.55% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack
- 0.27% fail on Drag link end
-
0.55% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Operation
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.14% fail on Other components
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Condition
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
-
7.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Emissions
- 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.27% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Hose
- 0.14% fail on Cap
-
7.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
- 0.27% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
0.82% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(72% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.27% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.27% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(83% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (81% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.82% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate
-
0.55% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(69% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Body condition
- 0.14% fail on Body security
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Outlander (2004 - 2006)
Well equipped, solidly built and roomy, with a good view out.