MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Outlander » 2004

Mitsubishi Outlander MOT Results

Registered in 2004
47.6% pass rate
from 632 tests in 2020
(12% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Outlander is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage (10 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 9.2% fail on Suspension arms (49% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Pins and bushes (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.0% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.95% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.79% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Mounting (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.79% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.63% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Axle
    • 0.63% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.32% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.95% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.5% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (14 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (71% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (80% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.3% fail on Lever
    • 0.63% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.47% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 16% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 15% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 14% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.47% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.47% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.79% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (83% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame condition (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (65% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.79% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages