MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Mirage » 2016

Mitsubishi Mirage MOT Results

Registered in 2016
86.8% pass rate
from 1,400 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Mirage is unusually good or bad.

  • 3.6% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (77% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.50% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.071% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.071% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.071% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.071% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.071% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.14% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.071% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.071% fail on Lever
    • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.071% fail on Reservoirs
  • 2.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.071% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (38% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.29% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.071% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.071% fail on Horn
    • 0.071% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.071% fail on Position lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.50% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.50% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.43% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.071% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.071% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.071% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.36% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.36% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
  • 0.21% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.071% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.071% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.071% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.071% fail on Body
      • 0.071% fail on Other body component
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages