Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results
Registered in 201165.9% pass rate
from 1,522 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(50% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(60% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(97% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads (98% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.85% fail on Brake discs
-
4.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(97% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.72% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.72% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.72% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(66% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.066% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt
- 0.066% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.066% fail on
Rbt
-
2.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.33% fail on Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Hand lever
-
0.20% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.20% fail on Lever
- 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(60% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
8.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension
(21% better than other 2011 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(59% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.066% fail on Linkage
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.72% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Springs
(46% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Coil springs
(46% better than other 2011 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Coil spring (46% better than other 2011 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Coil springs
(46% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.066% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.066% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.066% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.066% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.066% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(59% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(31% better than other 2011 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (54% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(44% better than other 2011 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.92% fail on
Headlamps
(65% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.066% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.85% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.85% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.85% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.13% fail on Position lamp
- 0.066% fail on All position lamps
-
0.13% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Individual direction indicators (87% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.066% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.066% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.066% fail on Battery(ies)
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.066% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.066% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.066% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.066% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
2.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.72% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.20% fail on
Emission control equipment
(21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Catalytic converter (39 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.066% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.8% fail on Washers
- 0.20% fail on Bonnet
-
0.20% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.20% fail on Windscreen
-
0.066% fail on
View to rear
- 0.066% fail on Mirrors
-
4.3% fail on
Tyres
(26% better than other 2011 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
3.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.53% fail on
Transmission
(59% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Joints
-
0.53% fail on
Drive shafts
(57% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Bumpers
-
0.13% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.066% fail on Tank
- 0.066% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.066% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.066% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.066% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
0.066% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.066% fail on Undertray
-
0.46% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.066% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.066% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.20% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.20% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Lancer (2008 - 2014)
Comes as saloon and a five-door Sportback. Competent and handles reasonably well. Ralliart is good fun.