Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results

Registered in 2010
72.0% pass rate
from 2,192 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (15% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.046% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.046% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.46% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Battery
    • 0.046% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.046% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.046% fail on Side repeaters
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.046% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.046% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.87% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.046% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.046% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.046% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.091% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.046% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.046% fail on Pedal
        • 0.046% fail on Anti-slip
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Valve stem (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 5.1% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.091% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.046% fail on Power steering
      • 0.046% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.046% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.8% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.78% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.091% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.091% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.091% fail on Rear
    • 0.046% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.046% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.046% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.046% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.046% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Emissions
    • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.091% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.091% fail on System
  • 0.46% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 0.046% fail on Condition
  • 0.27% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Requirements
    • 0.046% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.046% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.091% fail on Body condition
    • 0.046% fail on Doors
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.046% fail on Seats
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages