Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results
Registered in 200565.6% pass rate
from 1,471 tests in 2021
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(18% better than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.75% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.61% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.14% fail on Horn
-
0.34% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.34% fail on Position lamp
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.14% fail on
Direction indicators
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.068% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints (75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint
-
4.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.61% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.068% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.27% fail on
Axles
- 0.27% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Mounting
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.20% fail on Suspension rod (24 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(37% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Steering
(87% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Drag link end
- 0.068% fail on Locking devices
-
0.068% fail on
Power steering
- 0.068% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.068% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.068% fail on
Steering play
- 0.068% fail on Steering rack
-
7.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Brakes
(46% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.34% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(92% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
-
0.61% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.61% fail on Brake discs
-
0.068% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.068% fail on Lever
-
2.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
- 0.068% fail on Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.068% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.068% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.068% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.068% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.068% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.068% fail on Other components
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers (63% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
View to rear
- 0.41% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Bonnet
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(33% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Emission control equipment
(9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Catalytic converter (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.20% fail on
Compression ignition
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.068% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.068% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.068% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.068% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.41% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(34% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.61% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.54% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.61% fail on
Transmission
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Drive shafts
(82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Joints (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.068% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.068% fail on Joints
-
0.61% fail on
Drive shafts
(82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.48% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.27% fail on
Chassis
- 0.27% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.14% fail on
Body
- 0.14% fail on Panel
-
0.068% fail on
Towbar
- 0.068% fail on Towbar condition
-
0.068% fail on
Seats
- 0.068% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.068% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.068% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(67% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Seat belts
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.068% fail on Requirements
- 0.48% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Seat belts
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates
-
0.54% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.54% fail on Attachment