Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results
Registered in 200172.0% pass rate
from 232 tests in 2017
(43% better than other 2001 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(45% better than other 2001 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.7% fail on Front lamps
- 0.86% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(180% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 2001 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2001 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Switch
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.43% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.43% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.86% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.86% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.86% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.2% fail on
Position lamps
-
9.5% fail on
Suspension
(57% better than other 2001 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting
- 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.86% fail on Spring mounting
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.43% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
-
0.86% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(84% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.43% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.43% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.43% fail on Condition
-
0.43% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.43% fail on Condition
-
0.43% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.43% fail on Front
- 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.43% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.43% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.43% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
6.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
9.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.0% fail on Emissions
- 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.43% fail on Tank
- 0.43% fail on Hose
- 0.43% fail on Cap
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.2% fail on
Brakes
(71% better than other 2001 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% better than other 2001 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pipes (80% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Hoses
- 0.43% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.43% fail on Leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 2001 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(86% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.43% fail on Front wheels
- 0.43% fail on Brake operation
- 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.86% fail on ABS
-
0.86% fail on
Hub components
- 0.43% fail on Brake pads
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
-
2.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% better than other 2001 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.86% fail on Steering rack
-
0.86% fail on
Power steering
- 0.43% fail on Operation
- 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.43% fail on Other components
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
-
3.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(65% better than other 2001 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Wipers (77% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Windscreen
-
2.2% fail on
Tyres
(76% better than other 2001 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth (69% better than other 2001 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.86% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.86% fail on Registration plate
-
0.43% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.43% fail on Body condition