Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results
Registered in 200080.9% pass rate
from 136 tests in 2021
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp
- 0.74% fail on Dipswitch
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.2% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Horn
-
2.2% fail on
Position lamps
(9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Position lamp (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.74% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension
(57% better than other 2000 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.74% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.74% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.74% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.74% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.74% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.74% fail on Ball joint
-
5.1% fail on
Brakes
(61% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
0.74% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.74% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.74% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.74% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.74% fail on Brake discs
-
0.74% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
4.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
-
3.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.74% fail on Tank
- 0.74% fail on Hose
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
-
1.5% fail on
Front passenger's door
(9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Front passenger's door
(9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.74% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.74% fail on
Load security
-
0.74% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.74% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.74% fail on
Tailgate
-
1.5% fail on
Fuel system
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.74% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.74% fail on Steering rack
-
2.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Washers
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.74% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.74% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.74% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.74% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts