Mitsubishi Lancer MOT Results

Registered in 1996
67.3% pass rate
from 147 tests in 2017
(26% better than other 1996 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Lancer is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Fog lamp (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.68% fail on Switch
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Battery
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Horn
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.68% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 13% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Cap
  • 9.5% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.68% fail on Front
      • 0.68% fail on Rear
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.68% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Hoses
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes
    • 2.7% fail on ABS
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.4% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.68% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 3.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.68% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.68% fail on Steering arm
  • 4.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
  • 4.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.68% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.68% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.68% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.68% fail on Body condition
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages