MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Grandis » 2009

Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.8% pass rate
from 268 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Suspension arm (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.7% fail on Springs
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.37% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.75% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.37% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.37% fail on Horn
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.37% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.75% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.75% fail on Hand lever
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on Condition of glass (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Windscreen (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on View to rear
      • 0.75% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (49 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.37% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe (47 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Spare wheel (99 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Carrier (244 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Bumpers
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages