Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results
Registered in 200648.8% pass rate
from 502 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(40% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
14% fail on
Headlamps
(190% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 14% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (72% better than other 2006 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.00% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.00% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.60% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.60% fail on Position lamp
-
0.60% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.60% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.60% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.60% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.60% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
-
14% fail on
Headlamps
(190% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(86% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Suspension arm (18 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Ball joint
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
5.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.8% fail on
Springs
-
4.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.8% fail on Coil spring
-
4.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.00% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.20% fail on Suspension rod
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(86% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.20% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.00% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2006 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
(70% better than other 2006 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.80% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.80% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Cable
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.2% fail on Lever
-
0.80% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Brake fluid (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.80% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.80% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.60% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.60% fail on Hand lever
- 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.20% fail on
Hand operated control valves
- 0.20% fail on Operation
-
5.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(98% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
8.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(85% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Compression ignition
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
8.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(85% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
- 1.00% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Locking devices
-
0.60% fail on
Steering play
(4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.40% fail on Steering rack
-
0.20% fail on
Motorcycle derived steering systems
- 0.20% fail on Head bearings
-
6.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(170% worse than other 2006 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(44% better than other 2006 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.80% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.40% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.40% fail on
Chassis
- 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.40% fail on
Body
- 0.40% fail on Other body component
-
0.20% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.20% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.20% fail on Bumpers
-
0.20% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.20% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.20% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.20% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.6% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
- 0.80% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Grandis (2004 - 2010)
Striking-looking, roomy seven-seater with stacks of kit. Clever design details make it a versatile, practical carrier of people or cargo.