Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results
Registered in 200550.5% pass rate
from 503 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Suspension arm (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
5.8% fail on
Springs
-
5.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.8% fail on Coil spring
-
5.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.80% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.40% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.40% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.40% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.5% fail on
Headlamps
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Headlamp (88% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.99% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.80% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.20% fail on Horn
-
0.80% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.80% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.5% fail on
Headlamps
(84% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
0.99% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.80% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt
- 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.40% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.40% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.40% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.80% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.80% fail on Brake discs
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Lever
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.99% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.99% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.60% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.9% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
-
0.60% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.60% fail on Windscreen
-
0.60% fail on
View to rear
- 0.60% fail on Mirrors
- 0.20% fail on Driver's view
-
8.2% fail on
Steering
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Track rod end (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Steering arm
-
2.0% fail on
Steering gear
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Steering play
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Size/type
-
6.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.99% fail on Bumpers (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Spare wheel
(17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.20% fail on Carrier
-
0.40% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.20% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
0.20% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.99% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.80% fail on Condition
- 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.80% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.99% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.99% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.99% fail on Registration plates
-
0.60% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.60% fail on Attachment
-
0.20% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
-
0.20% fail on
Speed limiter
- 0.20% fail on Speed limiter plate
-
0.20% fail on
Speed limiter
-
0.20% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.20% fail on
Doors
- 0.20% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.20% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Grandis (2004 - 2010)
Striking-looking, roomy seven-seater with stacks of kit. Clever design details make it a versatile, practical carrier of people or cargo.