Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results

Registered in 2005
52.8% pass rate
from 599 tests in 2020
(6.2% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (5.9% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Suspension arm (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (10% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (4.0% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover (16% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Springs (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Coil springs (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Coil spring (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (24% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (53% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Sub-frames (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (6.8% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (5.3% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (17% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (57% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters (4.8% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (77% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment (7.7% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Position lamps (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Position lamp (84% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Switch
  • 15% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (0.70% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (5.1% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (27% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (23% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (8.3% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (4.1% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (8.1% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (13% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance (3.2% better than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested (76% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (14% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (16% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (36% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
        • 0.17% fail on Linkage
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (0.91% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Anti-lock braking system (26% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Hydraulic systems (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (21% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (8.2% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.17% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Condition (82% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth (1.3% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.17% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.83% fail on Steering play (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Steering gear (0.12% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Steering rack (2.9% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (17% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Fuel system (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Spare wheel (25 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Spare wheel condition (42 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Carrier
    • 0.50% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4.2% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (9.4% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Bumpers (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Body (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Seats (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.17% fail on Towbar
      • 0.17% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.17% fail on Transmission
      • 0.17% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
    • 0.17% fail on Undertray
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (14% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers (3.0% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Condition of glass (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Windscreen (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.17% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (19% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages