Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results

Registered in 2005
54.9% pass rate
from 787 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.9% fail on Position lamps (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Front lamps (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.51% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Direction indicators (87% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Flashing type (87% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.76% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.51% fail on Condition (29 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.0% fail on Hub components (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.4% fail on Components
        • 2.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.64% fail on Reservoirs (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Hoses
      • 0.64% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 2.8% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.38% fail on ABS
    • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.13% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Condition (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Windscreen (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system (56% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.89% fail on Free play (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.51% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.38% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.76% fail on Pipe (16 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on System
    • 0.64% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.89% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.76% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 0.64% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.25% fail on Body condition
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages