Mitsubishi Grandis MOT Results

Registered in 2004
47.2% pass rate
from 422 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Grandis is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 14% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 14% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.47% fail on Trailer electrical socket (27 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.47% fail on Rear reflectors (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Suspension arm (15 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Springs
      • 5.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.7% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.24% fail on Mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.71% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 15% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.47% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.24% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.47% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (97% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.71% fail on Lever
    • 0.71% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.24% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.24% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 11% fail on Tyres (49% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Size/type
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.71% fail on View to rear
      • 0.71% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Bumpers (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Spare wheel (35 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Spare wheel condition (57 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Carrier (21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Chassis
      • 0.47% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Body
      • 0.47% fail on Other body component
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.24% fail on Undertray
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.71% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.71% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering arm (21 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.95% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Motorcycle derived steering systems
      • 0.24% fail on Head bearings
  • 2.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.24% fail on Requirements
    • 0.47% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.95% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.95% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages