Mitsubishi Galant MOT Results

Registered in 2002
56.6% pass rate
from 244 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Galant is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.82% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.82% fail on Tell tale (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Switch (28 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.82% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.82% fail on Side repeaters
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 4.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Attachment
    • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.82% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.82% fail on Front
    • 0.41% fail on General condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.0% fail on Components
        • 7.8% fail on Pipes (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Hoses
        • 0.41% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.82% fail on Leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.82% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.2% fail on ABS
    • 0.82% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.41% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Condition
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type
    • 1.2% fail on Valve stem (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on System
      • 0.41% fail on Pipe
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.82% fail on Steering rack
    • 2.0% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Other components
      • 0.41% fail on Operation
  • 3.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 0.41% fail on Body security
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.82% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages