Mitsubishi Galant MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.0% pass rate
from 164 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Galant is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.4% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.2% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
      • 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.61% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.61% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.9% fail on Components
        • 7.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.61% fail on Hoses
      • 1.2% fail on Leaks
    • 7.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 0.61% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.61% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 0.61% fail on ABS
    • 0.61% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.9% fail on Emissions
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Size/type (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.2% fail on Free play (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Steering rack (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Operation
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.61% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 0.61% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.61% fail on Chassis
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Requirements
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages