MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Galant » 1999

Mitsubishi Galant MOT Results

Registered in 1999
64.6% pass rate
from 82 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Galant is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Suspension arm
    • 8.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.4% fail on Sub-frame (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.2% fail on Mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
  • 8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Joints
      • 1.2% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on System
  • 8.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 7.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.2% fail on Oxygen sensor
  • 4.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Steering play
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 1.2% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages