Mitsubishi Galant MOT Results

Registered in 1999
49.1% pass rate
from 106 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Galant is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
      • 0.94% fail on Attachment
    • 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.94% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.94% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.94% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.94% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.94% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.94% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.5% fail on Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.94% fail on Pipe
      • 0.94% fail on Cap
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 6.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 6.6% fail on Pipes
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal
        • 0.94% fail on Anti-slip
  • 11% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering system
      • 5.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.94% fail on Free play
        • 0.94% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.8% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Operation (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.94% fail on Other components
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Size/type
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.94% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.94% fail on Washers
  • 7.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.94% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.94% fail on Chassis
    • 0.94% fail on Seats
      • 0.94% fail on Passengers
  • 4.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.94% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.94% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages