Mitsubishi Galant MOT Results
Registered in 199949.1% pass rate
from 106 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Galant is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Suspension
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.94% fail on Condition
- 0.94% fail on Attachment
-
9.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 9.4% fail on Component mounting
- 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(170% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.94% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.94% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.94% fail on Condition
- 0.94% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.94% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.94% fail on Condition
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.6% fail on Front lamps
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.94% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.94% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.94% fail on Headlamp
-
0.94% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.94% fail on Electrical wiring
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.5% fail on Emissions
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.9% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.94% fail on Pipe
- 0.94% fail on Cap
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
6.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.6% fail on
Components
- 6.6% fail on Pipes
-
6.6% fail on
Components
-
4.7% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Front wheels
- 1.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
-
0.94% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.94% fail on
Pedal
- 0.94% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.94% fail on
Pedal
-
6.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
- 5.7% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
0.94% fail on
Free play
- 0.94% fail on Steering rack
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint
-
2.8% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Operation (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.94% fail on Other components
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 6.6% fail on Tread depth
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 0.94% fail on Size/type
-
8.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.94% fail on Windscreen
- 0.94% fail on Washers
-
7.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.7% fail on Body condition
-
0.94% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.94% fail on Chassis
-
0.94% fail on
Seats
- 0.94% fail on Passengers
-
4.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.94% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.94% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts