MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » FTO » 2005

Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.4% pass rate
from 64 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 27% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Suspension arm
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Chassis (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Chassis condition (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Engine mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.6% fail on Other body component
  • 22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 22% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 19% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 1.6% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 1.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on All direction indicators (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 9.4% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.6% fail on Steering column
    • 1.6% fail on Steering coupling
      • 1.6% fail on Universal joint
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
  • 4.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.6% fail on Requirements
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.6% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages