MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » FTO » 2000

Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results

Registered in 2000
62.9% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Electrical equipment (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Battery(ies) (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.4% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Cabs (24 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages