Mitsubishi FTO MOT Results

Registered in 1994
47.4% pass rate
from 114 tests in 2017
(28% worse than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi FTO is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 12% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Battery
    • 3.5% fail on Horn
    • 0.88% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 29% fail on Suspension (71% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.88% fail on Attachment
    • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.88% fail on Rear
  • 25% fail on Brakes (76% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 14% fail on Rear wheels (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Front wheels (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 5.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.3% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.88% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.88% fail on ABS
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.4% fail on Emissions
    • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.88% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Pipe
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 7.0% fail on Body condition
    • 3.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis
    • 0.88% fail on Doors
      • 0.88% fail on Passengers front
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.3% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.88% fail on Power steering
      • 0.88% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.88% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.88% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.88% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages