Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
44.9% pass rate
from 486 tests in 2017
(31% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (95% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 19% fail on Prescribed areas (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 16% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.3% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Leaf springs (21 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Shackle (37 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.62% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.62% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.62% fail on Front
    • 0.21% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 13% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 12% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Switch
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.82% fail on All position lamps (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Battery (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.21% fail on Switch
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Switch (17 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.82% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Brakes (48% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (70% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Components (73% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Operation
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake back plates (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.21% fail on Cable
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
  • 14% fail on Steering (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 0.82% fail on Other components
      • 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.21% fail on Rams
    • 0.21% fail on Steering operation
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 12% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (75% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.41% fail on Cap
      • 0.41% fail on System
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 6.8% fail on Washers (92% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Size/type
  • 8.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats
      • 0.41% fail on Passengers
    • 0.21% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.21% fail on Load security
      • 0.21% fail on Tailgate
  • 2.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 0.82% fail on Towbars
    • 0.82% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages