Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
49.2% pass rate
from 65 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 20% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 20% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Tell tale
      • 1.5% fail on Switch
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.5% fail on Switch
  • 29% fail on Suspension (92% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 18% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spring mounting (15 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Component mounting
    • 9.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage condition
    • 9.2% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.1% fail on Leaf springs (34 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
      • 1.5% fail on Spring saddle
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.2% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 3.1% fail on Hoses
      • 1.5% fail on Leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Wipers
    • 7.7% fail on Washers
  • 12% fail on Steering
    • 11% fail on Steering system
      • 7.7% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Free play
        • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.6% fail on Body condition
    • 3.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Passengers
  • 9.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Pipe
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages