Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results
Registered in 201074.3% pass rate
from 2,715 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(18% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.4% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front lamps (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.074% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Horn
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.074% fail on Battery
- 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
-
8.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Washers
- 0.37% fail on Windscreen
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
- 0.037% fail on Bonnet
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Valve stem
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension
(50% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(84% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.66% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Condition
- 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.70% fail on
Coil springs
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.33% fail on Rear
- 0.18% fail on Front
-
0.15% fail on
Suspension arms
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Shock absorbers
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.074% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.037% fail on Attachment
- 0.037% fail on General condition
-
0.037% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.037% fail on Condition
-
0.037% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.037% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.037% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.037% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brakes
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
- 0.037% fail on Brake drums
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Front wheels
- 0.29% fail on Rear wheels (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.074% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.074% fail on
Components
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Pipes
- 0.037% fail on Hoses
- 0.074% fail on Leaks
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on ABS
- 0.037% fail on Restricted movement
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
-
1.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Installation check
- 0.037% fail on Anchorage's
-
0.44% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Seat belts
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Exhaust system (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Emissions
- 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
0.22% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.22% fail on Registration plate
-
0.18% fail on
Steering
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.074% fail on Drivers
- 0.037% fail on Passengers
- 0.037% fail on Body security
- 0.037% fail on Body condition
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Colt (2008 - 2013)
Affordable to run, Ralliart version is great fun to drive, feels robust and reliable.