Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.3% pass rate
from 2,715 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front lamps (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.074% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Horn
    • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.074% fail on Battery
    • 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.037% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.037% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.037% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts (81% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front drive shafts (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
      • 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.70% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.33% fail on Rear
      • 0.18% fail on Front
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension arms (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.074% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.037% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.037% fail on Attachment
    • 0.037% fail on General condition
    • 0.037% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
    • 0.037% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.037% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.037% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.037% fail on Condition
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.037% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.29% fail on Rear wheels (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.037% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.074% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.074% fail on Components (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Pipes
        • 0.037% fail on Hoses
      • 0.074% fail on Leaks
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.037% fail on Restricted movement
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Seat belts (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.074% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Installation check
        • 0.037% fail on Anchorage's
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.44% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Exhaust system (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions
    • 0.037% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.22% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.18% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.074% fail on Drivers
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers
    • 0.037% fail on Body security
    • 0.037% fail on Body condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages