MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Colt » 2010

Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.1% pass rate
from 3,087 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.065% fail on Side repeaters (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.032% fail on Switch
      • 0.032% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.032% fail on Front fog lamp switch
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.032% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.032% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.097% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.065% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.065% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage ball joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (36% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (39% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.097% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.032% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.065% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.032% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.032% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Transmission (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.032% fail on Joints
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.065% fail on Panel
      • 0.065% fail on Other body component
    • 0.065% fail on Doors
      • 0.065% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
    • 0.065% fail on Seats
      • 0.032% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.065% fail on Undertray
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.87% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.032% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.032% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 0.84% fail on Steering (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Steering linkage components (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.032% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.032% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.065% fail on Condition
    • 0.065% fail on Attachment
  • 0.065% fail on Identification of the vehicle (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Registration plates (84% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages