MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Colt » 2009

Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results

Registered in 2009
60.1% pass rate
from 4,516 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.33% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (50% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.089% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.044% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.022% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.022% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Springs (35% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Coil springs (35% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Coil spring (35% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.066% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.066% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.066% fail on Sub-frames (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.022% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.044% fail on Axles
      • 0.044% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.044% fail on Other suspension component (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.089% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.066% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.066% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.089% fail on Other body component
      • 0.022% fail on Panel
    • 0.089% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.089% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.044% fail on Fuel system (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.044% fail on Doors (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
      • 0.022% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
    • 0.044% fail on Seats
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.022% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.022% fail on Chassis
      • 0.022% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.022% fail on Towbar
      • 0.022% fail on Towbar condition
  • 5.5% fail on Brakes (37% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (39% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (36% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (44% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (43% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.42% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.022% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.044% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.022% fail on Pedal
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.066% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.022% fail on Valves
    • 0.066% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.066% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.044% fail on Steering gear (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.71% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.066% fail on Airbags
      • 0.044% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.022% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (26% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.66% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.044% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.022% fail on Oxygen sensor
          • 0.022% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.22% fail on Compression ignition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.044% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Speedometer (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages