Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results
Registered in 200550.8% pass rate
from 3,133 tests in 2021
(7.3% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(13% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Springs
(77% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(78% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Coil spring (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Mounting
- 0.032% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(78% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.032% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Suspension arm (80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.22% fail on
Axles
- 0.22% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint
-
0.096% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.064% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.096% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.064% fail on
Sub-frames
(87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.3% fail on
Springs
(77% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(17% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.064% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.3% fail on
Flashing type
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.67% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.22% fail on Horn
- 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.51% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.32% fail on Position lamp
- 0.032% fail on All position lamps
- 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.032% fail on Switch
-
6.0% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(48% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
-
0.16% fail on
View to rear
- 0.16% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
- 0.096% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.064% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(21% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.096% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.096% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.032% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
(38% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake drums (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.064% fail on Linkage
- 0.032% fail on Cable
- 0.032% fail on Lever
- 0.032% fail on Relay lever
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.64% fail on Lever
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever
- 0.064% fail on Pedal
-
0.38% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.13% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.064% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.064% fail on Flexible brake hoses (81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.064% fail on Other components
-
0.032% fail on
Pressure storage reservoirs
- 0.032% fail on Air and vacuum systems
-
7.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(17% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Joints
-
0.16% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.16% fail on Joints
-
3.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.35% fail on
Chassis
- 0.35% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.032% fail on Tank
- 0.26% fail on Bumpers
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.22% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.032% fail on Bracket
-
0.096% fail on
Doors
(82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.064% fail on Door condition
-
0.032% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.032% fail on Door condition
-
0.064% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.032% fail on
Body
- 0.032% fail on Other body component
-
0.032% fail on
Load security
- 0.032% fail on Access panel
-
0.032% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.032% fail on Other boot lid component
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
-
5.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(23% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.032% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.032% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.35% fail on
Compression ignition
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.064% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
4.8% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.064% fail on
Fluid leaks
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Engine oil leaks (82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(20% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Steering
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Track rod end (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Ball joint
-
0.096% fail on
Power steering
- 0.096% fail on Operation
-
0.096% fail on
Steering play
- 0.096% fail on Steering rack
- 0.096% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.064% fail on
Steering gear
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(64% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
(47% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Prescribed areas (64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.032% fail on
Airbags
- 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.70% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.70% fail on Registration plates
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.064% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Mitsubishi Colt (2004 - 2008)
Well priced, roomy, versatile, a real 'little big car'. Good 1.1 petrol and 1.5 diesel engines.