Mitsubishi Colt MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.5% pass rate
from 254 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Colt is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.79% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front lamps (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.39% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Prescribed areas (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Component mounting (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Presence
    • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.79% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.39% fail on Front
      • 0.39% fail on Rear
    • 0.39% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 6.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.7% fail on Components
        • 6.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.79% fail on Hoses
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.79% fail on Rear wheels (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on ABS
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.79% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Cap
      • 0.39% fail on System
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.1% fail on Condition
  • 6.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.79% fail on Doors
      • 0.79% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.39% fail on Engine mountings
  • 3.5% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.39% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.39% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages