Mitsubishi Challenger MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.8% pass rate
from 52 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Challenger is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 19% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 17% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Hoses
        • 3.8% fail on Valves
      • 5.8% fail on Leaks (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Operation (33 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Hub components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 3.8% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.9% fail on Pedal
        • 1.9% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.9% fail on Restricted movement
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 9.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.8% fail on Front
    • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.8% fail on Pipe (29 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Tank
    • 3.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Emissions
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
  • 9.6% fail on Steering
    • 9.6% fail on Steering system
      • 5.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.9% fail on Other components
        • 1.9% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering
      • 1.9% fail on Other components
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.8% fail on Chassis
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.9% fail on Doors
      • 1.9% fail on Passengers other
  • 5.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
  • 1.9% fail on Towbars
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages