MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Challenger » 1999

Mitsubishi Challenger MOT Results

Registered in 1999
53.7% pass rate
from 147 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Challenger is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.68% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.68% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.68% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.68% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.68% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.68% fail on Other braking system component
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.68% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.68% fail on Joints
    • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Body (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Mounting fixings (66 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Other body component (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Body condition
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.68% fail on Tank
    • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.68% fail on Doors
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.68% fail on Hinge
    • 0.68% fail on Seats
      • 0.68% fail on Driver's seat
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 6.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Springs
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.68% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Intermediate drop arm (60 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other components
        • 0.68% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.68% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.68% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.68% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.68% fail on Condition
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages