Mitsubishi Carisma MOT Results

Registered in 2000

49.5% pass rate

from 107 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Carisma is unusually good or bad.

17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.7% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.8% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.93% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Position lamps (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Position lamp (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.93% fail on Battery(ies)
15% fail on Brakes
- 8.4% fail on Brake performance
  - 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 3.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
  - 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.8% fail on Rbt
      - 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.93% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.93% fail on Rbt
      - 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.8% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.9% fail on Brake discs
15% fail on Suspension
- 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 5.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.93% fail on Linkage
- 4.7% fail on Springs
  - 4.7% fail on Coil springs
    - 4.7% fail on Coil spring
- 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.8% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.93% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.93% fail on Macpherson strut
15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 15% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 14% fail on Spark ignition
    - 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.93% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.93% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
12% fail on Visibility
- 8.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.93% fail on Driver's view
- 0.93% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.93% fail on Windscreen
- 0.93% fail on View to rear
  - 0.93% fail on Mirrors
11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 7.5% fail on Transmission
  - 7.5% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 7.5% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.93% fail on Body
  - 0.93% fail on Other body component
7.5% fail on Tyres
- 4.7% fail on Condition
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.93% fail on Size/type
3.7% fail on Steering
- 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.93% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.93% fail on Operation
2.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 2.8% fail on Registration plates
0.93% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.93% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas