Mitsubishi Carisma MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.2% pass rate
from 219 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Carisma is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.91% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.7% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.91% fail on Switch (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.7% fail on Individual lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Battery
    • 0.46% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (80% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 15% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.91% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.91% fail on Cap
    • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.7% fail on Components
        • 6.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
        • 0.46% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.91% fail on Leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.46% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension (55% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.91% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.4% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.91% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.91% fail on Prescribed areas (85% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Component mounting (81% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 6.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.46% fail on Free play
        • 0.46% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 0.91% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers
    • 0.46% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.46% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.46% fail on Chassis
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.46% fail on Load security
      • 0.46% fail on Access panel
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (75% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.91% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages