Mitsubishi Carisma MOT Results

Registered in 1998
45.4% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Carisma is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Switch (35 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.80% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.40% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Horn
  • 18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 13% fail on Emissions (96% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
    • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment
    • 2.8% fail on Trailing arms (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Component mounting (85% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.40% fail on Front
    • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.40% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.2% fail on Components
        • 7.2% fail on Pipes (91% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Hoses
      • 0.80% fail on Leaks
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.2% fail on Wipers (72% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.40% fail on Washers
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
    • 0.40% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Steering arm
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.80% fail on Doors
      • 0.80% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.80% fail on Seats
      • 0.80% fail on Passengers (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Body condition
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (72% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Requirements
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages