MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2017

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2017
72.4% pass rate
from 170 tests in 2021
(100% worse than other 2017 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (146 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp (158 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Outline marker lamps (3886 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Outline marker lamp (3886 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.59% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.59% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.59% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 10% fail on Visibility (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on View to rear (59 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Mirrors (62 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (43 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.59% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.59% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.59% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 3.5% fail on Suspension (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.59% fail on Springs
      • 0.59% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.59% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Tank
    • 0.59% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.59% fail on Transmission
      • 0.59% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.59% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.59% fail on Body
      • 0.59% fail on Panel
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.59% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages