MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2016

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2016
77.6% pass rate
from 174 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.0% fail on Visibility (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Washers (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.57% fail on View to rear
      • 0.57% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.57% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.57% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.57% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.57% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs (3114 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Leaf spring (9346 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.57% fail on Coil spring
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Body (59 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component (50 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.57% fail on Panel
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Tank
    • 0.57% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.57% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.57% fail on Seats
      • 0.57% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (33 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.57% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.57% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
  • 0.57% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages