Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2015
62.6% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2020
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (40 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (12 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Switch
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Outline marker lamps (1130 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Outline marker lamp (1236 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.55% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition (18 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (30 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Compression ignition (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear (22 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors (23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Size/type (27 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 4.9% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (56 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (59 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (146 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.55% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.55% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.55% fail on Brake pads
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs (2399 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Anchor pins and bushes (13203 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.55% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 2.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Bumpers (35 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Body (31 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.55% fail on Other body component
    • 0.55% fail on Doors
      • 0.55% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.55% fail on Door condition
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages