Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results
Registered in 201262.7% pass rate
from 102 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(110% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.98% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.98% fail on Position lamp
-
0.98% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.98% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.9% fail on Coil spring
-
2.0% fail on
Leaf springs
(1095 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.98% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.98% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.98% fail on Ball joint
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (64 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
-
8.8% fail on
Brakes
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.98% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
- 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.98% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.98% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.98% fail on Brake discs
-
0.98% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (16 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
-
2.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.98% fail on
Seats
- 0.98% fail on Driver's seat
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
-
0.98% fail on
Steering
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.98% fail on Drag link end
-
0.98% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.98% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.98% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.98% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.98% fail on
Seat belts