MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2012

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2012
62.7% pass rate
from 102 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.98% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.98% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.98% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.98% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring
      • 2.0% fail on Leaf springs (1095 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.98% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.98% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes (64 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.98% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.98% fail on Brake discs
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Compression ignition (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (16 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.98% fail on Seats
      • 0.98% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.98% fail on Steering
    • 0.98% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.98% fail on Drag link end
  • 0.98% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.98% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.98% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages