Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results
Registered in 201067.2% pass rate
from 137 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(69% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Position lamps
(200% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Rear lamps (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Front lamps
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Fog lamp (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Tell tale
-
2.9% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on All direction indicators (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
-
2.9% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.73% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 6.6% fail on Tread depth
- 4.4% fail on Condition
-
9.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
- 2.2% fail on Mirrors (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Windscreen
-
8.0% fail on
Suspension
-
4.4% fail on
Axles
(612 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.6% fail on King pins (4968 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Stub axle
-
2.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(6558 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (5465 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.73% fail on Shackle
-
2.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.73% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.73% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.73% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.73% fail on Front
-
0.73% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Axles
(612 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brakes
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
-
2.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.73% fail on Brake discs
-
0.73% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.73% fail on
Pedal
- 0.73% fail on Condition
-
0.73% fail on
Pedal
-
0.73% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.73% fail on Operation
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.73% fail on
Other components
- 0.73% fail on Steering pivot point
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
-
2.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Speedometer
- 0.73% fail on Body condition
-
0.73% fail on
Seats
- 0.73% fail on Drivers
-
0.73% fail on
Load security
- 0.73% fail on Hinged tailboard
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.73% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.73% fail on Tank
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.73% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts