MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Canter » 2010

Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.8% pass rate
from 129 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.78% fail on Switch
    • 3.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.78% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.78% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.78% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.78% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.78% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.78% fail on Horn
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Compression ignition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.78% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.78% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Servos
      • 0.78% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.78% fail on Lever
    • 0.78% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.78% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.78% fail on Brake pads
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Size/type
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.78% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.78% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.78% fail on View to rear
      • 0.78% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Axles (86 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on King pins (6736 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Stub axle (1795 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (48 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs (2244 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.78% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.78% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.78% fail on Steering play
      • 0.78% fail on Steering box
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.78% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.78% fail on Load security
      • 0.78% fail on Dropside
        • 0.78% fail on Dropside condition
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages